Legislation Details

File #: 21-9705    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Public Hearings Status: Adopted as Amended
File created: 8/3/2021 In control: City Council
On agenda: 10/5/2021 Final action: 10/5/2021
Title: Subject: Consider an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to uphold the Director of Community Development’s approval of a Two-Story Permit to allow a new 2,992 square-foot two-story home with a 746 square-foot attached accessory dwelling unit and a Minor Residential Permit to allow a new 115 square-foot second-story balcony. (Application Nos.: R-2020-035, RM-2020-023; Applicant: Smart Lily, LLC.; Property Owners: Tariqul Khan and Chaman Hafiz; Appellants: Jitesh Vadhia and Chih-Lung Lin; Location: 1506 Primrose Way; APN # 366-15-018)
Sponsors: Kirsten Squarcia
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. A - Draft Resolution for R-2020-035, 3. B - Draft Resolution for RM-2020-023, 4. C - Single-Family Residential (R-1) Ordinance, 5. D - Planning Commission Resolution No. 6925 (R-2020-035), 6. E - Planning Commission Resolution No. 6926 (RM-2020-023), 7. F - Approved Plan Set, 8. G - Chih-Lung Lin Appellant Letter and Supplemental Documents, 9. H - Jitesh Vadhia Appellant Letter and Supplemental Documents, 10. I - Neighborhood Distribution of Two-Story Residences

Title

Subject:  Consider an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to uphold the Director of Community Development’s approval of a Two-Story Permit to allow a new 2,992 square-foot two-story home with a 746 square-foot attached accessory dwelling unit and a Minor Residential Permit to allow a new 115 square-foot second-story balcony. (Application Nos.: R-2020-035, RM-2020-023; Applicant: Smart Lily, LLC.; Property Owners: Tariqul Khan and Chaman Hafiz; Appellants: Jitesh Vadhia and Chih-Lung Lin; Location: 1506 Primrose Way; APN # 366-15-018)

 

Recommended Action

That the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 21-091 for Application R-2020-035 (Attachment A) and Resolution No. 21-092 for Application RM-2020-023 (Attachment B) denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s decision to uphold the Director’s approval of the applications.