IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City's website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City.

File #: 17-2309    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Public Hearings Status: Adopted
File created: 1/30/2017 In control: City Council
On agenda: 2/7/2017 Final action: 2/7/2017
Title: Subject: Petition for Reconsideration regarding the City Council decision of December 6, 2016, denying Petitioner Kimberly Sandstrom’s appeal of the determination that she is ineligible to purchase a Below Market Rate (BMR) unit
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. A-1 Draft Resolution, 3. B-1 Reconsideration Petition December 19, 2016, 4. C-1 Approved City Council Resolution No. 16-101 (Subject of Reconsideration), 5. D-1 Approved Housing Commission Minutes June 23, 2016, 6. E-1 Approved Housing Commission Minutes August 11, 2016, 7. F-1 Approved Housing Commission Resolution No. 16-07, 8. G-1 City Council Staff Report from underlying Appeal and its attachments A-H, 9. A- Summary of Conflict of Interest Investigation, 10. B- Draft City Council Resolution No. 16-101, 11. C- Housing Commission Resolution 16-07 (Resolution No. reassigned), 12. D- Excerpts from BMR Manual Regarding Income Calculation, 13. E- Referenced Regulations (24 CFR 5.609(b) and (c), 14. F- Technical Guide for Determining Income, 15. G- Attachments and Other Documents Provided by Appellant, 16. H- Sandstrom presentation

Title

SubjectPetition for Reconsideration regarding the City Council decision of December 6, 2016, denying Petitioner Kimberly Sandstrom’s appeal of the determination that she is ineligible to purchase a Below Market Rate (BMR) unit 

 

Recommended Action

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Consider the Petition for Reconsideration (Attachment B-1) and deny it for its failure to meet the requirements of Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC) Section 2.08.096 and adopt Resolution No. 17-016 (Attachment A-1); or, in the alternative;

2. Conduct a hearing to reconsider its decision of December 6, 2016 based upon the new evidence and grounds proffered by Petitioner, if Council determines that the Petition meets the requirements of Cupertino Municipal Code section 2.08.096, and affirm its decision denying Petitioner’s appeal