Legislation Details

File #: 21-9153    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Public Hearings Status: Conducted First Reading
File created: 4/21/2021 In control: City Council
On agenda: 5/4/2021 Final action: 5/4/2021
Title: Subject: Consideration of Municipal Code Amendments to the Cupertino Municipal Code, Chapter 10.90, expanding existing policies to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke, including in multi-unit housing, entryways, public events, service areas, and outdoor worksites. (Postponed from April 20)
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. A - Draft Ordinance 21-2224 to Regulate Smoking (First Reading Approved on 3/2/21) Clean, 3. B - Draft Ordinance 21-2224 to Regulate Smoking (First Reading Approved on 3.2.21) Redline, 4. C - Revised Draft Ordinance to Regulate Smoking Clean, 5. D - Revised Draft Ordinance to Regulate Smoking Redline, 6. E - March 2, 2021 Staff Report, 7. F - Tobacco Free Communities Policies in Santa Clara County

Title

Subject:  Consideration of Municipal Code Amendments to the Cupertino Municipal Code, Chapter 10.90, expanding existing policies to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke, including in multi-unit housing, entryways, public events, service areas, and outdoor worksites. (Postponed from April 20)

 

Recommended Action

1.                     Reintroduce with amendments and conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 21-2227: “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending City Code Chapter 10.90 of Title 10 (Public Peace, Safety, and Morals) to prohibit smoking in multi-unit housing and certain outdoor areas,” which adds setback requirements for designated smoking areas and includes detached ADUs and JADUs in the regulations, and which includes a finding that the Ordinance is exempt from CEQA; or

2.                     Conduct the second reading and enact Ordinance No. 21-2224 “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending City Code Chapter 10.90 of Title 10 (Public Peace, Safety, and Morals) to prohibit smoking in multi-unit housing and certain outdoor areas,” which includes a finding that the Ordinance is exempt from CEQA.